Don 3: Farhan Akhtar has cast Kiara Advani as the lead actress in his next movie, Don 3. Ranveer Singh and Kiara are now part of the well-known movie franchise.
Farhan Akhtar welcomed Kiara to the franchise today with an announcement post.?
Check it out here:
Kiara's part in Don 3 is said to have "negative shades," despite the fact that specifics regarding the role are still unknown. If rumors are to be believed and if we go by what fans are saying then she is expected to take on the character of "Roma," which was formerly portrayed by Priyanka Chopra.?
Reacting to the post one said, ¡°Kiara Advani replacing Priyanka Chopra in Don is the biggest downgrade in bollywood after Ranveer Singh replacing SRK. Shraddha Kapoor would have been ideal choice as she has a strong personality plus no one can deny she is fabulous in action sequences and dance!"
Another wrote, "She can't replace Priyanka"
Kiara Advani and Ritesh Sidhwani were spotted at Farhan's office just one day after the Don 3 announcement. The actor from "Lust Stories," according to a source close to Bollywood Hungama, is thrilled to be joining the project.
An insider told Bollywood Hungama, ¡°Director Farhan Akhtar felt that Kiara fit the bill perfectly. Moreover, she has never been paired with lead actor Ranveer Singh before. Kiara, too, is excited to be a part of an exciting action franchise. She is looking forward to playing the stylish part and also collaborating with Farhan Akhtar and Ranveer Singh.¡±
Ranveer Singh said in a conversation with Deadline, ¡°I¡¯m hoping to make Don my own and give it my spin, my interpretation. It is the handing over of the baton of one of the most loved and revered franchises of Hindi cinema. The significance of that is not lost on me. When the announcement was made, as expected, it came with its share of scepticism. But throughout the history of cinema, this has happened. Even as recently as perhaps when the Bond franchise changed hands and they announced Daniel Craig as the new Bond, it came with its fair share of scepticism. So, this is only natural.¡±