In April 2016, Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar announced a ban on the sale and consumption of country liquor in the state. The ban was one of Kumar＊s key poll promises made to women voters每who rallied behind him strongly.
PTI
Thirty days after the ban, Kumar claimed that the crime was down 27% , according to his analysis of crime data from April 2016 and April 2015. ?
Nine months每or 270 days每into the ban, an IndiaSpend analysis of Bihar Police crime data, reveals that cognizable crime每which the police can investigate without a magistrate＊s order每rose 13% between April and October 2016, from 14,279 in April to 16,153 in October (latest available data).
PTI
In other words, the liquor ban does not correlate with a drop in crime, a primary reason for the new law, which came into being despite the Patna High Court holding it violative of the Constitution because it denied citizens their right to privacy under Article 21.
Conviction of criminals in Bihar had declined 68%, from 14,311 in 2010 to 4,513 in 2015, and cognizable crimes rose 42% over the same period, IndiaSpend reported in May 2016.
Bihar has a lower crime rate than more prosperous states with fewer people, such as Gujarat, Kerala, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, mainly due to under-reporting, IndiaSpend reported in May 2016.
PTI
The Patna High Court had quashed the alcohol ban in September 2016, terming the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act 2016, ※illegal§. The new Bill provided punishment that included arrests of all adults in the family if anyone stores or consumes alcohol.
Those flouting the ban face up to 10 years in jail, and a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh. If a government bill is struck down by the courts, legislative sanction can convert it into a law that the courts cannot interfere with. That is what happened in Bihar.
Within two days of the high court order, the Bihar government notified a new law, the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, ensuring that the ban on sale and consumption of alcohol, including Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) and ※spiced§ and domestic liquor, continued in the state, even though the high court said a ban was ※ultra vires of the constitution§.