Explained: What Is Uniform Civil Code
Uniform Civil Code (UCC) are set of laws that govern personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption for all citizens regardless of their religion, gender and sexual orientation. The aim of implementing a UCC is to replace the existing personal laws that vary based on religious practices and create a common code applicable to all citizens.
Uniform Civil Code (UCC) are set of laws that govern personal matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption for all citizens regardless of their religion, gender and sexual orientation. The aim of implementing a UCC is to replace the existing personal laws that vary based on religious practices and create a common code applicable to all citizens.
At present, various communities across the country follow their own personal laws which are governed by their religious scriptures. Bharatiya Janata Party was long in pursuit of implementing uniform civil code across the nation. However, till date it remains a matter of debate where the political left wing, muslim groups and other conservative religious groups feel that UCC is opposed to the values of secularism in Indian politics
History of Uniform Civil Code
The concept of a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India can be traced back to the colonial era. During British rule, there were separate legal systems for different communities, such as the Hindu law, Muslim law, and various other personal laws for different religious communities. These laws governed matters such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, and adoption.
After India gained independence in 1947, the issue of a Uniform Civil Code became a part of the national discourse. The framers of the Indian Constitution recognized the need for a uniform set of laws that would govern personal matters for all citizens, irrespective of their religious affiliations. However, they also respected the diversity of the country and provided for the protection of religious and cultural rights.
Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, which is a Directive Principle of State Policy, states: "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India." Directive Principles are guidelines for the government to frame laws and policies, but they are not legally enforceable.
Despite the inclusion of Article 44 in the Constitution, successive governments in India have not been able to implement a Uniform Civil Code. The issue has been a subject of intense debate and controversy, primarily due to religious sensitivities and concerns about encroaching on personal laws.
Several attempts have been made to introduce a Uniform Civil Code. In 1951, the government appointed the first Law Commission to examine the issue, but its recommendations were not implemented. In the 1980s, the Supreme Court of India made observations regarding the need for a Uniform Civil Code, particularly in the Shah Bano case, which involved the maintenance rights of a divorced Muslim woman.
Arguments against Uniform Civil Code
1. Cultural and Religious Diversity: India is a diverse country with a rich tapestry of cultures and religions. Critics argue that imposing a UCC would undermine the cultural and religious identities of different communities. They believe that personal laws are an integral part of religious practices and should be respected.
2. Threat to Minority Rights: Opponents of a UCC argue that it could disproportionately affect minority communities. Personal laws provide certain protections and rights to religious minorities, and implementing a UCC might be seen as an attempt to homogenize and assimilate these communities into the majority culture.
3. Violation of Freedom of Religion: The right to freedom of religion is enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Critics argue that imposing a UCC could infringe upon this fundamental right by compelling individuals to conform to a uniform set of laws that may not align with their religious beliefs and practices.
4. Lack of Consensus: There is a lack of consensus among various religious communities on the issue of a UCC. Each community has its own traditions, customs, and religious laws that they wish to preserve. Critics argue that implementing a UCC without the consent and agreement of all communities could lead to social unrest and division.
5. Gender Bias Concerns: Critics argue that personal laws, particularly those pertaining to marriage, divorce, and inheritance, are often discriminatory against women. They contend that instead of imposing a UCC, there should be efforts to reform personal laws to ensure gender equality within each community.