How The Hinduja Brothers Have Finally Ended Their $14 Billion Family Feud

For several decades, Britain’s richest family, the Hinduja brothers, have always presented a united front to the outside world. They have represented the?business philosophy that everything belonged to everyone.

From their shared family homes in London, Mumbai and Geneva, they oversaw an Anglo-Indian business empire that has lasted over a century.

Scmp/twitter

But, with the ailing 86-year-old patriarch Srichand Hinduja, known as SP, who suffers from dementia, a feud had spread bitterness in the family, including nephews and nieces, uncles, cousins and grandchildren going further apart than anyone ever knew, as per a Bloomberg report. The family feud, until resolved, had threatened to put the century-old business empire's future in jeopardy.

Late last year, funding from Britain's richest family, who have a combined wealth of more than $14 billion, dried up to such an extent that lawyers brought in to act on behalf of SP said they were seriously considering moving him out of a private hospital to a state-funded one. However, lawyers representing Srichand’s 82-year-old brother Gophichand had reportedly denied this, stating that ?5 million ($5.9 million) had been made available for him.

The family has now called a 'temporary truce', but the long-running and rancorous dispute has put at stake the future governance of the Anglo-Indian $14 billion empire.

With 1.5 lakh employees in almost 40 countries, the empire’s assets reportedly include six publicly traded entities in India and range from one of the largest private banks in India, IndusInd bank, to Ashok Leyland Ltd., the world’s third-largest manufacturer of buses.

What Was The Feud?

The story of the battle can only be reported following a London court bid by Bloomberg News and others to lift restrictions, ending years of secrecy. The judge agreed, taking the unusual step of saying that Srichand Hinduja had become so marginalized that public scrutiny of the family’s behaviour would be in his best interests.

Central to the disagreement was a pact the Hinduja brothers made eight years ago?in July 2014 that “everything belongs to everyone and nothing belongs to anyone.”

Whatever the intended spirit of that variation on “one for all and all for one” was, it wasn’t on display in the courtroom in London, as per the report.

Srichand's younger brother Gopichand had challenged the legitimacy of a lasting power of attorney granted to Srichand's wife Madhu and later his daughters, Vinoo and Shanu, as per Reuters.??

Different interpretations pitted Srichand’s branch of the family, led by his daughter Vinoo, against the rest. Vinoo insisted that her uncles sought to cut her side of the family out of funding and decision-making, leaving her with no choice but to assert control of her father’s assets.

The brothers reportedly framed the litigation as a power grab that goes against SP’s long-held wishes.

Each side accused the other of serious wrongdoing and denied misconduct as they battled to control the court narrative. Gopichand’s lawyer himself compared the turmoil to Leo Tolstoy’s epic novel 'War and Peace.'

It was a long way from the Hinduja brothers’ agreement that the family’s assets should be held jointly, as per the report.

At times fighting tears, Gopichand also told the judge that the four brothers were “one soul.” He recalled a conversation with SP while they walked through Green Park in central London.

“We two brothers never had any feuds, he had said. “He told me, if I go earlier, look after my own daughters as if they’re your own.”

The Other Side Of The Story

But, in SP’s weakened state, daughter Vinoo alleges that exactly the opposite happened, as per the report.

bloomberg

Also Read:?Bill Gates Vows To Donate All?Wealth?& Drop Off From?Rich?List??

SP Hinduja's daughter said her side of the family was deprived of income from 2014 until it dried up entirely in 2018.

Vinoo, who rarely left her father’s bedside and was at one time accused of shouting at hospital staff and called it a “financial squeeze.” She said her branch of the family was left with no choice but to draw on Srichand’s own resources.

As per the report, in the spring of 2021, Vinoo and her sister, Shanu Hinduja, admitted to the judge that they’d used SP’s funds for their own purposes and given up their guardianship of his property and affairs. Their lawyer, Clifford Chance, withdrew from representing them.

The conflict of interest in the two daughters continuing to hold onto the power of attorneyship was “flagrant,” Judge Hayden said.

Between 2013 and 2021, as much as $26 million may have been spent from Srichand’s personal funds, including legal fees and funds for his grandchildren, according to lawyers for Gopichand.

In now-deleted?tweets from last year, Srichand’s grandson Karam Hinduja wrote: “The philosophy of SP’s brothers is not so much ‘all for one, and one for all,’ but rather ‘all for us, period.’” He said: “There is nothing ‘joint’ about this family.”

Gopichand disputed this characterization. After the ruling, Vinoo and Shanu were clear that a wider agreement amongst the family had yet to be signed.

“While we are pleased that the dispute surrounding the health and welfare of our father has been resolved, a final settlement with respect to the broader disputes still needs to be reached, so that we can fulfil the wishes of our parents for security and dignity in their final years,” the two said in a statement.

With the allegations flying back and forth, David Rees, a lawyer for Gopichand, said he’d tried to end the dispute by conceding that the 2014 letter, a document signed by all four brothers, was no longer binding on Srichand Hinduja.

As per the report, the letter, which was said to create a trust over the assets, has now been effectively torn up.

So, a truce. For now. But the question of future relationships and ownership is still up in the air.

“This is a family who have repeatedly emphasized, and publicly so, that their family code is munificent, bounteous, and open-hearted,” the judge said in his ruling. “Quite how this principle is realized in day-to-day life is difficult to appreciate, having regard to the complexion of the litigation in this court.”

Family's Statements After Court Ruling

As per the Reuters report,?Srichand’s daughters Vinoo and Shanu Hinduja said in a separate emailed statement that they welcomed "the transparency that this ruling will bring to the proceedings", but said a final agreement had still to be achieved.

"While we are pleased that the dispute surrounding the health and welfare of our father has been resolved, a final settlement with respect to the broader disputes still needs to be reached,” they added.

Last Friday's “decision has no impact whatsoever on the ongoing care of Mr. SP Hinduja, on which the family are united, or on any business operations,” a spokesperson for Gopichand Hinduja said. “The family looks forward to continuing a harmonious relationship in the future.”

Also, Vinoo’s side of the family denied any misappropriation of cash. According to her lawyers, funding was cut off to such an extent that they “had no new money coming in from wider family resources.” It was therefore drawing on funds held by Srichand personally,” they said.

Also Read:?Tata Steel May Exit?UK?If ?1.5 Billion Funding Denied

For the latest and more interesting financial news, keep reading?Indiatimes Worth.?Click here